Buffalo Golf Club tee times

What golfers love

Golfers tell us that the golf course in the Chicago area exceeded their expectations, even in February. Despite the windy weather, the course was in surprisingly good condition, with smooth greens and well-maintained fairways. Many players were impressed by the course management and the overall experience, considering it above average. The staff was friendly and helpful, adding to the enjoyment of the game. According to reviews, the course offers a well-kept and enjoyable playing experience. However, some golfers expressed frustration with slow play, particularly on the East course. The lack of rangers and the presence of slow groups affected the pace of play, which disappointed some players. Despite these concerns, the course's good conditions, friendly staff, and value for the money stood out as positive aspects. The course received praise for its overall quality, with well-maintained greens and fairways. Golfers appreciated the excellent facility quality and found the course to be reasonably priced. In terms of difficulty, some players found the course to be somewhat challenging, with tree-lined fairways that added to the overall charm of the experience. Overall, golfers who played this course were pleased with the good conditions, friendly staff, and enjoyable playing experience. While there were some issues with slow play, the positive elements of the course outweighed the negatives for many players.

Good to know

Golfers tell us that the course needs improvement in the following areas: - Pace of play: Multiple reviewers noted slow play and a lack of rangers to enforce course expectations. Some experienced delays in tee times. - Course difficulty: Reviewers mentioned tight landing areas and increased difficulty compared to the scorecard. Long rough was reported to make shots difficult. - Staff quality/friendliness: While staff friendliness was generally praised, there were also reports of delays and running out of carts. Some found the staff somewhat challenging to deal with. - Value for the money: Value for the money seemed to be generally positive, but some reviewers noted average or fair value. - Facility quality: There were mixed reviews about the quality of the facilities. Overall, these areas are highlighted as needing improvement by golfers who played the course.